February 28, 2024

Comparison of AI Transcription Tools: vs Yating vs Goodtape

Looking for an AI transcription tool that's fast, accurate, and user-friendly? Check out this comparison between Goodtape, and Yating. TL;DR - check out the table at the end of this post if you just want a quick comparison of the features.

Comparison of AI Transcription Tools: vs Yating vs Goodtape

In the rapidly evolving world of speech recognition and transcription services, users are often on the lookout for accurate, efficient, and user-friendly platforms. In this article, we will compare three notable contenders in the market:, 雅婷 (Yating) and Goodtape. This comparison will focus on features, performance, pricing and user feedback.

Introducing the Contenders stands out as an advanced voice collaboration platform renowned for its robust AI-driven transcription, translation, and analysis capabilities. Professionals and individuals appreciate its accuracy and user-friendly features, making it suitable for various purposes such as business meetings, interviews, podcasts, and lectures.


Yating, on the other hand, is a speech-to-text service that is optimized for Taiwanese accents and languages. It can record and transcribe audio files in Mandarin, English, and Taiwanese, and provide summary, speaker identification, share, and topic/tags features. While it's gained some popularity, it has also garnered mixed reviews from users.

Goodtape is another contender in the AI transcription market. With its focus on providing accurate and efficient transcription services, Goodtape aims to cater to users' diverse needs. While it may not have gained as much prominence as or Yating, its features and performance merit consideration.

Feature Comparison

Multiple Language Support: Both and Yating support multiple languages, including Mandarin, English, and Taiwanese, whereas Goodtape only supports English and Mandarin as input languages. In addition, is capable of translating transcripts into more than 25 popular languages, ensuring global usability and accessibility.

Functionality: and Yating boast features such as speaker identification, transcription revision, and translation capabilities. Goodtape does not offer translation functionality for transcripts, but it has its own unique approach for other functionalities, which users need to explore further to determine if the approach works well for them. also offers integration with popular video conferencing software, but for Yating and Goodtape, this functionality is missing.

Interface: boasts an intuitive and easy-to-use interface, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced users. Yating has a similar user interface, although it is focused more on transcription than anything else. Goodtape, on the other hand, features a simple, almost minimalistic interface. While this arguably lets users focus on the task at hand, it gives the impression that it has limited functionalities (see screenshot below).

Performance Comparison

Accuracy: While and Goodtape demonstrate high accuracy rates across various audio files based on our internal testing, Yating's accuracy may vary, especially with certain accents or languages. This seems to corroborate with online reviews citing significant accuracy issues with English transcriptions, rendering them nearly unusable. This may make it a questionable investment for professionals in the global market.

Processing Speed: and Goodtape exhibit fast processing speeds, ensuring quick turnaround times for transcriptions. That's because both tools make use of large language models (LLM) for the transcription, unlike Yating, which doesn't have this in place. Hence, Yating may lag behind in this aspect, affecting user experience.

One additional note though. If you’re on Goodtape’s free plan, you may have to bear with the waiting time, which can be quite long (see screenshot below).

Price Showdown

Goodtape offers a competitive pricing model, making it an attractive option for users with budget constraints. However, its free plan for casual users only offers up to 3 recordings per month and up to 30 minutes per tape in its Tape Vault.

Pricing information for Yating is not readily available, but based on our research, it works out to about NTD 2.16 per minute (not factoring in promotional discounts), which seems to be quite budget-friendly until you take into consideration issues like accuracy and processing speed. is no slouch either when it comes to pricing. It has flexible plans for individuals, teams, and enterprises, allowing users to choose based on their specific needs. Unlike Goodtape's limiting free plan,'s Basic plan does not impose that many restrictions on usage, other than the 200 V-points that you get when you register for an account. Plus, if your usage is relatively light, you will benefit from the 60 V-points that tops up to your account every month. If you want to figure out how much usage that will provide, check out this article.

User Feedback has garnered positive reviews from users who are particularly impressed with its transcription and translation capabilities. Features like Action Items, commenting, and tagging are also useful to help teams collaborate better.

While some users appreciate Yating's language optimization for Taiwanese accents, others express concerns about accuracy and performance issues.

Feedback on Goodtape highlights its reliability, affordability, and ease of use, making it a preferred choice for users seeking efficient transcription solutions.

At-a-glance comparison table

Like this article? Share it with your friends and associates! Remember to follow us on Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter for news and updates about Vocol. Better still, leave us a rating on the following review sites and we will love you forever!

AlternativeTo | Crozdesk | Product Hunt | SaaSHub | There's An AI For That | SourceForge | Slashdot | BetaList